2026 cycle

⌕
467
On the roster
$31.5M
Total raised
23,500
Named donors
78%
Median in-state

How the money moves

Two separate bodies of law govern the officeholders in this tracker. Federal rules cover the U.S. Senate and House seats; Montana's own rules, enforced by the Commissioner of Political Practices, cover the governor, statewide offices, the legislature and the courts.

Federal law

U.S. Senate and U.S. House · enforced by the FEC

Money from committees that raise on behalf of federal candidates falls into a handful of legal categories, each with its own rules for how much can flow through it, whether it can coordinate with a campaign, and whether its donors are ever named publicly.

Committee types at a glance
Federal committee types and their donation limits, coordination rules, and donor-disclosure requirements for the 2026 cycle.
Committee typeWho controls it?Donation limit?Can they coordinate with campaigns?Must disclose donors?
Traditional CampaignThe CandidateYes ($3,300)Yes (It is the campaign)Yes
Traditional PACCorporations, Unions, or Interest GroupsYes ($5,000)Yes (Can donate straight to campaigns)Yes
Leadership PACPoliticians/OfficeholdersYes ($5,000)Yes (Used to fund other candidates)Yes
Joint Fundraising Committee (JFC)A Partnership of Candidates & PartiesYes (But limits are stacked)Yes (Money is split among members)Yes
Super PACIndependent Staff & ConsultantsNo (Unlimited)NO (Strictly prohibited)Yes
Hybrid PAC (Carey Committee)Independent Staff (Dual-Account)No (For independent ads) / Yes (For campaign gifts)NO (For the unlimited ad account)Yes
501(c) Non-Profit ("Dark Money")Issue Advocacy GroupsNo (Unlimited)NO (Strictly prohibited)NO (Completely anonymous)
ProhibitedUncapped

Montana state law

Governor, statewide offices, legislature, courts · enforced by the COPP

Montana's limits don't vary by committee type the way federal limits do; they vary by the office being sought, and apply per election rather than per cycle.

Limits per election, November 7, 2025
Montana contribution limits per election by source of the money and office sought, effective November 7, 2025.
Source of the moneyGovernor / Lt. GovernorOther statewide officeLegislature & other public office
The candidate
To their own campaign
No limitNo limitNo limit
Individual
A human being
$1,190$830$470
Political committee
PACs; excludes party committees
$1,190$830$470
Political party committee
Aggregate from all party committees
$118,700$89,050$3,550 Senate / $2,350 House
Corporation or union
Directly or indirectly
ProhibitedProhibitedProhibited
ProhibitedUncapped
"Per election" is not per cycle

A contested primary and a general election count as two separate elections, so the cap applies twice. With no contested primary there is only one.

Corporate money routes around the ban

Corporations and unions may not give to a candidate, but they may fund a segregated PAC out of voluntary contributions from shareholders, employees or members, and independent spending is not capped at all.

Party money now reaches judges

House Bill 39 (2025) repealed Montana's prohibition on party committees contributing to judicial candidates, so Supreme Court and district judge races can now take party money.

Dark money moves through "incidental" committees

A nonprofit whose main purpose isn't political can register with the COPP as an incidental committee to spend on Montana races. It only has to itemize money it received specifically as a campaign contribution: the general donations that fund it, which federal law already lets it keep anonymous, don't count and never appear. A committee can show tens of thousands of dollars in spending here against zero dollars in contributions on record.

Glossary

What the labels and figures used throughout this site actually mean.

Ballot measure spending
Money raised or spent for or against a statewide ballot measure (a constitutional initiative, statutory initiative, or legislative referendum), not tied to any candidate. A local levy or bond isn't included: it's filed as free text with no official code, and the same measure shows up spelled a few different ways across filings with nothing to reconcile them against.
Cash on hand
How much money a campaign reported still having in the bank at the end of its most recently filed report, federal or state.
Committee type
Federal and Montana law each define a handful of these (a traditional PAC, a Super PAC, a Joint Fundraising Committee, and others), each with its own limit on how much it can raise, whether it can coordinate with a campaign, and whether its own donors are ever disclosed publicly. See the tables above for what each one can and can't do.
Compare
Select up to four officeholders or candidates from the roster to view their funding side by side.
Electioneering communication
An ad that names a candidate close to an election without expressly telling anyone how to vote, a separate legal category from an independent expenditure. Not tracked on this site: Montana stopped requiring this disclosure after a change in state law, and the FEC doesn't publish federal filings for it as itemized data the way it does for independent expenditures.
Independent expenditure
The kind of political spending that expressly tells someone how to vote ("vote for," "defeat"), reported by the committee that paid for it, not by the candidate it names. By law that committee can't coordinate with the candidate it's spending on.
In-state %
Shown two ways on this site. The "Median in-state" figure at the top of every page is a median: it takes each officeholder's own in-state percentage and finds the middle one, so a handful of races dominated by out-of-state money can't drag it down by themselves. The in-state share on the donor geography page is dollar-weighted instead, every dollar counted once wherever it came from, which is why the two numbers rarely match.
Itemized contributions
Contributions from donors who gave enough that the campaign had to report their name and address. Smaller gifts are reported in an aggregate lump sum instead, which is why every itemized total on this site (money by industry, donor geography, money by source type) is smaller than Total raised.
Money by source type
Splits itemized contributions by who gave them: a named individual person, or a PAC or committee. A different question from which industry the money came from, which is what the sector breakdown answers instead.
Named donors
The count of distinct individuals, PACs, and committees who appear by name across every itemized contribution this tracker has.
Outside support / Political spending
Money spent independently by Super PACs and similar committees to help or hurt a candidate, paid to vendors directly rather than given to the campaign. Left out of Total raised, since the campaign itself never touches it.
Sector / industry
A category assigned from a donor's self-reported employer and occupation, which a filer isn't always required to give and often leaves blank. Contributions that don't map to a real industry (a PAC as the donor, "retired," left blank) are grouped into "Political Committees," "Retired / Not employed," or "Other / Unclassified" instead of being dropped, so the totals still cover every itemized dollar.
Top sector
The industry category that gave the most to a given officeholder or candidate, built from their donors' self-reported employer and occupation.
Total raised
Everything a campaign reported raising to the FEC or Montana COPP, including small-dollar contributions below the itemization threshold. The headline figure on every officeholder's page.

State figures are the COPP summary applicable as of 7 November 2025; party-committee giving to Public Service Commission candidates is capped separately at $17,800 per election. Individuals and political committees may give without limit to party committees, PACs and ballot issue committees. Federal figures are per-election amounts for the 2026 cycle. Full requirements are in Title 13, Chapters 35 and 37, MCA, and at the Commissioner of Political Practices.